FSDN: DotGNU GNU-Friends FSF Europe Sorce Mage GNU/Linux
[GNU-Friends] Sections: Front Page News Interviews GNU-Friends Diaries
Menu: About Submit Story FAQ Donate Search
This page brought to you by: Jonas berg, just another GNU friend.
Free Software Gives Best TCO Result
By a member of the hurd, Section News
Posted on Fri Sep 20th, 2002 at 07:03:34 GMT
Leading Internet analyst Brendan Scott shows that the long run TCO of free software must be lower than that for proprietary suites. This result is independent of licensing costs for the proprietary suite.

The paper is available from: http://www.members.optushome.com.au/brendanscott/papers/freesoftwaretco150702.html (for more information contact Brendan Scott at brendanscott@optusnet.com.au).

 

The paper's result is that the long run TCO for a suite of proprietary software must necessarily be greater than that for an equivalent suite of free software. The TCO benefits are maximised in the case of the GPL and GPL-like free software.

The total cost of operation of a suite of free software is the price determined by a competitive market for a bundle of goods and services associated with that suite. Because the source code is open and not subject to limitations on development or distribution, the market for services relating to that code will be perfectly competitive. A rational vendor will use a proprietary route for a program only where releasing that program in that way will allow them to increase their profit above that which would be returned to them by the operation of a competitive market. This result should be hardly surprising, given that the express objective of copyright law is to mandate a market failure and permit software creators to extract above market rents as an incentive for the creation of that software.

Customers attempting to evaluate a free software v proprietary solution can confine their investigation to an evaluation of the ability of the packages to meet the customer's needs, and may presume that the long run TCO will favor the free software package. Further, because the licensing costs are additional dead weight costs, a customer ought to also prefer a free software solution with functionality shortfalls where those shortfalls can be overcome for less than the licensing cost for the proprietary solution.

The paper is available from: http://www.members.optushome.com.au/brendanscott/papers/freesoftwaretco150702.html

For more information contact Brendan Scott at brendanscott@optusnet.com.au

Note: this story has already appeared on LinuxToday in August 2002.

< Final Report of UK CIPR (1 comments) | Powered by GNU (6 comments) >
Login
Make a new account
Username:
Password:

View: Display: Sort:
Free Software Gives Best TCO Result | 1 comments (1 topical, editorial) | Post A Comment
[new] Here is good website (#1)
by a member of the hurd (#-1) on Wed Apr 13th, 2005 at 12:32:37 GMT

Here is good website I will introduce it to my friends ʪ Ī ʪͼƬ ʪ̳ ͼ ͼ2 links add Health links ֪ʶȫ ʪ ʪ վŻ վŻ ʪ ʪ ʪ ʪ ʪ ʪ ʪ ʪ ʪ Բ Բ֪ʶ վŻ Google google Google ֪ʶ ѯ Ʒ Ʒ ...........


[ Reply to This ]


 
Free Software Gives Best TCO Result | 1 comments (1 topical, editorial) | Post A Comment
View: Display: Sort:

Verbatim copying and distribution of this article is permitted in any medium, provided this notice is preserved. Images of gnu:s in the logo are © Free Software Foundation, Inc and distributed under the GNU General Public License. Comments are copyright by thir respective owner. All other material are © 2002 .