I don't think I've ever really been a big fan of Lindows. The non-disclosure agreements, rebranding of software, concentration on running proprietary Windows applications... It all reeks of one of those get-rich-quick pyramid schemes. michaelr is right, they have done a great deal for the community - he enumerates these points in his interview - but that should not be viewed as a bribe to the community to allow him to violate the GPL. The GPL does not have any provisions about release-type, etc, only about distribution.
Frankly, I think this particular distribution is more of a hindrance than a help - money and code aside, the major contribution they have given is the "Linux just wants to be Windows!" impression they've helped cement in the press. Thanks, but no thanks.
--
Kids, kids, we can all try the exciting new toothpaste from Mars!
[ Reply to This ] |