Adding More Sections |
|
By jonas, Section GNU-Friends
Posted on Mon Feb 18th, 2002 at 06:59:29 GMT |
|
Something I feel would be nice to have is the ability for users to select for themselves which sections they want to see on the front page. Slash has something similar to such a feature, though theirs is opt-out (ie., "See all news, except for those in this, this and that section") and I think opt-in would be ever so much cuter. Especially when, if, we start adding more sections to GNU-Friends. Read on to learn about which sections I've thought about.
|
The first thing one should realise about sections is that they're not really that. They're more like channels, and channels can contain streams of news and non-news (like regular news updates or diary entries). One such stream is the endless amount of newly released Free Software. I've been thinking about creating a box that would display new releases of software that exists in the Free Software Directory. This should be doable, with a bit of tinkering since the Directory is sometimes lagging on new releases, so it should be combined with some sort of polling mechanism to poll for new software on the ftp sites.
But is that enough? Such a list of new software could only point to one or at most two places, such as the download directory and the softwares home page. If we were to create a section -- or channel -- for it, we could list so much more about it, starting with automatically importing the NEWS (if it exists) or ChangeLog (secondary) into the article mentioning the new release. This would also allow people to post comments related to the new release and discuss it right here on GNU-Friends. I can see some areas where this might be a good idea.
Following on the channel idea, I've also thought about something similar to that; an Events channel. An Events channel would function similar to the New Software channel, but contain links, information and dicussions related to upcoming and ongoing events that relate to Free Software. Of course, the problem with this is that they may simply be too numerous! But again, this might sometimes be useful. What do you think?
|
|
|